Here is a list of things which require community consensus, a technical to-do list and a list of changes we have implemented during our incubation period. You may find a partial content assessment at the bottom. If you would have a suggestion, you may post it on our community page.
we have dropped categorization by exact dates, we categorize only by year and month (it should be enough for our current output volume, and so that we should not have to create so many empty category pages) → changes to our Date template
we no longer use {{Wn/hu/Publikált}} to mark published articles, instead we use plain form [[Category:Wn/hu/Publikált]], so that we don't have to type in sortkeys multiple times within the same article
all [mainspace] articles now have a sortkey in this format: {{DEFAULTSORT: sortkey}}, so that not all of our articles would appear under W when browsing categories
we now have one community page (Wn/hu/Wikihírek:Társalgó) instead of the earlier branched system which we adopted from hu.wp
some help and project pages were not imported, as we intend to rely more on hu.wp in this regard (they have more resources to keep such pages updated than we do)
portals were not imported as our output volume is too low
we no longer import articles from outside sources, even if they allowed us to do so earlier (others should be able to verify the permissions, but the permissions we received were not passed through OTRS, furthermore we did not use them for over ten years)
Currently, infoboxes appear as side panels in mobile view - adopt either the English version where they fill the width or the Russian version where they do not appear at all
for some purposes, integration either with the Hungarian Wikipedia or the English Wikinews, and Meta (consensus needed):
some local help pages should redirect to hu.wp (grammar, transliteration, basics of editing) or Meta (mission statement)
a final step of dispute resolution could be an appeal to either the hu.wp or en.wn Arbcom
set our rules for translating articles
should we have a wider freshness horizon? Maybe allow publishing within four days?
en.wn experiences regular review delays: if a translator starts to work on an article after it got published there, oftentimes he/she would not have enough time to finish the translation before the story goes stale;
if the review process changed the text there, we should re-translate the affected sections
if they issue a correction, so should we
should translators check the sources when they translate from projects without a review process?
a shallow adoption of the review process
we are too small to introduce Flagged Revisions (used on hu.wp and en.wn);
core issue: at least one person other than the author should check the article AND its sources
difference to the hu.wp system: time sensitivity (freshness → there is a limited amount of time to publish before a story goes stale)
aim: allow our readers to build trust with us
might be a target: do not allow not-yet-checked articles to appear on the main page
templates could mark stages: to-be-reviewed → reviewed.
confirmation votes to establish some en.wn/hu.wp rules which we have adopted (it was a hu.wp custom to automatically accept translated en.wp policies as local policies)
check page history (it is missing, if the page was copy-pasted);
we should have a unified discussion about clearing the content:
possible criteria: core policy (freshness, NPOV) violations
we might be permissive: small infractions in the cases of articles with a unique focus (i.e. articles might pass, if their focus was not processed by the Hungarian media)
at a future point, we should invite editors from hu.wp to confirm/assess our choices and procedures
