Wikimedia Incubator

Incubator:Administrators/Archive/Test adminship 2007

< Incubator:Administrators‎ | Archive

pe7er (contributions), Wp/dsb

I wish to apply for admnistrator status for Lower Sorbian pages. Pe7er 14:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done — Timichal 15:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slamet Serayu, Test-wp/mad

I request for admnistrator status on Test-wp/mad. Slamet Serayu 01:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done — Timichal 15:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mikolasz at Test-WP/surzh

I am a administrator of Surzhyk test Wikipedia and i would like to give administrators rights to Mikolasz, because he is a native speaker of a language (i am not one). --Dmitry Nikitin 14:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done There is already a test administrator. And no reaction on a question. SPQRobin 14:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Markvondeegel at Wp/aeres

Jeroenkon has asked me to become test-admin for the Aeres testwikipedia if we had 50 articles. Because we have 50 articles now and I've promised to place a request I'll do that. I have made about one third of all the edits of the test-Wikipedia. -Markvondeegel 14:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


It's almost 10 days ago since he started, when does he become testadministrator?? Petrolov 07:41, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ehm... There are 4 admins, 3 of them are bureaucrat. I am the most active, but I am the one who is not a bureacrat. So: I want to do it but I can't :-( SPQRobin 20:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked timichal on IRC, he'll probably look into this soon. Cbrown1023 talk 01:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes,   Done. — Timichal 07:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yaroslav Zolotaryov

I request test adminship in Latin Russian test just because I am the proposer, I have enough experience in Incubator and in several Wikipedias and want to help to develop this test. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 14:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  1.   Support because Yaroslav is maker of ru-lat division (sorry, I don`t speak english) --Tigran Mitr am 14:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support after the IRC talk becuase of 2 reasons. MF-Warburg 14:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Care to share? Cbrown1023 talk 23:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, yes ;-) There are users in ru: who plan to vandalize the test and he was test admin yet: [1]. But if there weren't these reasons I would oppose because of ru-sib. MF-Warburg 12:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support He has experience - he's administrator of ru-sib wiki. --Ostikhin 14:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support He is a frank and respectful person in wikki and in real live, he has a big experience and talant to be calm and rightious in any situations. --ryu 14:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support enough edits, enough community on ru-lat(one of the fastest growing testprojects) He will be a good testadministrator. Konghier 17:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support--Tarih 06:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support per Tigran Mitr am--Ottorahn 19:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support per Above. --Deutscher Friedensstifter 10:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support, see below --VasilievVV 19:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

#   Oppose. Adminship will be used for POV-pushing. See m:Requests for new languages/Latinized Russian --VasilievVV 19:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Comment - newly registered user without contributions - ruwiki can make hundreds of such "votes". --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    It's meta project. I have no contributions, because there is nothing to contribute (you, of course, are developing another nonsence here) --VasilievVV 19:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No, Incubator is not Metapedia, so arguments like "I do not like this user" should not be taken into account, especially when you do not write in this project. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Good example of POV-pushing just after VVV pointed to it ;) Congratulations, Yaroslav ;) — Kalan 19:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Withdrawing my vote because I don't think there will be any problems with candidate, because he's requesting for test adminship --VasilievVV 19:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Oppose per VasilievVV, m:Requests for new languages/Latinized Russian, m:SIB, ru:Википедия:Заявки на арбитраж/YaroslavZolotaryov and so on. — Kalan 19:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Oppose. Adminship will be used for POV-pushing. In Russian Wikipedia, there is is an actual arbitration case, where plaintiffs, respectful admins at most, request to block him infinitely because of multiple rules violation. --Obersachse 19:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    But in Siberian wikipedia I am bureaucrat and administrator. Everybody may know from Meta about this war betwen the ruwiki and sibwiki - so the relationships between this wikies are irrelevant to this voting. Actually all the three votes "Oppose" voted also against the creation of this wiki in Meta - but this Incubator discussion is not the place to discuss should this wiki be opened or not. You are against this project in general so you want that it would be no reasonable admins there - but if opposers to this porject vote against me, this is another good argument to elect me - even opposition testifies that I will serve to this project correctly. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 19:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    There were violations in ruwiki. Can you guarantee, that there won't be violations in ru-lat? What about ru-sib? You are founder and bureaucrat. What have You done against POV-pushing, nonsense-articles and vandalism in the wiki, where You are responsible? Sorry, but I can't trust you. --Obersachse 23:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    In my opinion, it were no violations in ruwiki, but I was sometimes blocked just because of this flame war between Russian and Siberian Wikipedias, and part of this war is the flashmob which can be seen below. I every day fight with vandalism in sibwiki, actually you can see sibwiki users like Ottorahn voting for me above. But Russian wikipedia is known by it's intolerance to the Siberian language - even the interwikies to ru-sib are prohibited in ruwiki because of this intolerance. Even now you are leader of persons, who try fill the page by words "oppose" from newly created accounts. Surely, this is this ruwiki show which can not be trusted. Besides of that, this is not the place we somebody decides should ru=lat be tested or not. If it is being tested, it should have an admin, I am the proposer, ru-lat community has consensus about me, so everything is simply --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 00:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Strong   Oppose! He's excellent example of fascist, nazism, intolerance and POV-pushing. Say NO! another scam-project after Ru-Sib-Wiki. --Pauk 22:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Personal attack made by opposer of the idea, but this is not voting about the idea. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 03:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Pauk: I blocked you for one day because of en:Wikipedia:No personal attacks. MF-Warburg 12:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: this user now writes in Russian Wikipedia: "MF-Warburg is probably fascist"[2], and, actually, ask for a flashmob from ruwiki to here. I propose to make some measures against such flashmobbing. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 22:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Oppose for POV-pushing. --Amron 23:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC) (please see #Comment. SPQRobin 00:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
    Newly created account, possible beginning of troll flashmob. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 23:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Oppose Yaroslav has his own view on how Russian should be Latinized, dfferent from all other standards. If he to became admin users with other point of view will be blocked. Also there are concerns that he may abuse his powers in other projects.--(ru:Участник:Nxx) (please see #Comment. SPQRobin 00:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
    Vote from anonimous user, begining of flashmob from ruwiki (you can see the invitation in the forun of this wikipedia) --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 23:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Oppose This is not a flashmob. I don't feel like Yaroslav is going to use sysop privileges in an adequate manner. It's just another self-promotion. Stop abusing wikimedia resources! --Volkov 23:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC) (please see #Comment. SPQRobin 00:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
    Vote from newly created account after announcement in ruwiki, wote by user, who voted against the ru-lat test. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 23:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    So what? I'm free to express my opinion, ain't I? Or you cannot tolerate anyone who doesn't share your point of view? How are you going to be an admin then? --Volkov 23:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Attempts to organize a flame discussion from the user with newly created account, combined with unproved accusations. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 23:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Your remarks just prove your intolerance which is unacceptable for an admin in any project. --Volkov 23:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No, just saving the place from flame)) --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 23:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Oppose - The candidate is prone to POV-pushing in the ru and ru-sib Wikipedia editions (abusing the admin/bureaucrat status in the ru-sib to push his own POV); and to pursuing personal attacks against Wikipedians in Wikimedia projects talk pages and on non-Wikimedia web resources. A few vandalism cases were also noticed in the ru edition. --BeautifulFlying 23:22, 9 August 2007 (UTC) (please see #Comment. SPQRobin 00:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
    Vote from newly created account after announcement in ruwiki. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 23:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Oppose. Well known for POV-pushing, esp. anti-russian, creating highly controversial "Siberian" Wikipedia and so on. -- Paul Pogonyshev 23:42, 9 August 2007 (UTC) (please see #Comment. SPQRobin 00:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
    Vote from newly created account after announcement in ruwiki. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 23:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Oppose per VasilievVV, Kalan and Obersachse --Kartmen 23:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC) (please see #Comment. SPQRobin 00:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
    Vote from newly created account after announcement in ruwiki. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 23:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Just wonder why bother to place the same comment to every vote? There are many voters from ru-wiki because you are well-known there. People who just created accounts here to prove their identity are contributors not only to ru-wiki but also to many other wikimedia projects. --Volkov 00:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    But they are new in incubator and have came after an announcement. It is well known that ruwiki in it's majority (I mean users who usually participate in votings) is against ru-lat, so all this votes are actually the attempt to stop the test by all means. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 00:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Well known where? What majority? :) --BeautifulFlying 00:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Just see in Meta the page of voting about ru-lat - almost the same persons vote against ru-lat, who came here after the announcement. This makes evident that they actually want to stop the test by destroying of admin elections. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 00:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Oppose --Russianname 12:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC) (please see #Comment. SPQRobin 12:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  12. Strong   Oppose! 85.192.55.6 13:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC) (please see #Comment. SPQRobin 13:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  13.   Oppose POV-pushing. Antifa 22:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC) (please see #Comment. SPQRobin 22:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  14.   Oppose POV-pushing. (seems to have some kind of social-orientated psychical disorder which may affect his professional competency) Zander 23:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Oppose I don't think that he will become neutral admin HexxelHammer 17:32, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1.   Oppose I don't want a not-neutral user to be an administrator. L Stotch 18:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Template:Neutral Can't support because of the concerns brought up, but I have no particular need to oppose your candidacy. Cbrown1023 talk 23:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually they simple repeat their votes in Metapedia here. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 03:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Template:Neutral I don't know how I stand on this one. I don't thing I can oppose, but a support is much after all those opposes. -Markvondeegel 11:26, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment

Actually, all votes count, but in this case I've striked out the votes from newly created accounts after an announcement in ruwiki. Those users have nothing to do with the incubator. And even the reason they give have nothing to do with Incubator. And he is already been a test administrator, see the archive. SPQRobin 00:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the first 4 votes "Oppose" were from the newly created account without contributions too, you can check this. All the votes "Oppose" are from newbies. If some announcement for newbies will be made in the top pf this vote, I will help with translation to the Russian language. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 00:41, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, Pauk had some contribs, but I doubt that the vote with argumentation "He is fascist and Nazist" is good vote:-)) --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 00:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So this is [3] how the policy changes in Incubator? Wow! --BeautifulFlying 00:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The most important rule on all Wikimedia projects is: Ignore all rules. So I was just thinking not POV, but point of Incubator, i.e. what is the best for Incubator? SPQRobin 00:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the users were alerted that it will not be counted. I think everything is very simple - the test is big, somebody should protect him, so you are completely right. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 00:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The real policy is - this is not voting at all, the votes are not counted, but bureaucrat make decision. It was written before you begin to vote. So this is bureaucrat's business, what votes will he strike out and what will not. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 00:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just read - The requests below are not votes. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 00:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I also read, Other users are given five days to place comments - that's what we the other users did. Now the comments are striken out. But, sure, ignore all rules. Whatever. --BeautifulFlying 00:58, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But to flood the page with stereotipical comments from new accounts is absurd. Besides of that, people without contributions are not real users (contributors). If somebody will register 10000000 accounts and fill the page with words "ZOLOTRAYOV AND WARBURG ARE FASCISTS" - should the administration read all this or make something? --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 01:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If have removed my lines I added, now there is just a link to this #Comment. Otherwise this whole section is messed up. SPQRobin 01:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just FYI, newbie on incubator doesn't mean 'no contributions' at all. Cf. mine [4]. The same applies to the majority of voters. --Volkov 07:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --BeautifulFlying 01:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can you convince your friends from ruwiki do not create many accounts just for "vote" here? Actually their POV is already represented. Just to minimize our work of explaining to them that this is not voting. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 01:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok let us hope that it will prevent further filling of this page with things irrelevant to the Incubator. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 01:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So: Discussion closed. To all voters: do something constructive instead of useless voting. As with the policy: After five days, a bureacrat (me probably?) will look at this. Thank you. SPQRobin 01:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decision
  • Support arguments:
    • He is already been a test administrator (experience, trusted user, etc)
    • Proposer of the Latin Russian test language.
  • Oppose arguments:
    • Using his test adminship for POV-pushing etc
      • What has this to do with this test adminship?
      • Those people who give this argument are not serious: User:Pauk accused User:MF-Warburg as a fascist after MF-Warburg blocked him, because of a personal attack
      • They think it is for adminship: When VasilievVV had seen the difference, he had withdrawn his vote.

The quantity (all those opposes after a message at the Russian Wikipedia) doesn't count, it is which arguments there are. After some thoughts, I have decided that User:Yaroslav Zolotaryov will be a test administrator. SPQRobin 12:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, mr Robin. I was just fearing that some of them will not only flashmobbing but also vandalizing and it will be a big trouble for admins who do not understand Russian. --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 12:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Markvondeegel in Wp/art-da

Can i want that user:Markvondeegel to become also admin on Wp/art-da?

  Support i support; he is good admin to be ever.

He is already an admin. SPQRobin 16:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But not at Wp/art-da
doesnt matter, sysop is sysop. he can also delete wp/art-da and block you etc. MF-Warburg 18:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But I see where his confusion came up. Markvondeegel is a regular sysop, not a test administrator. Therefore, he can use his powers all over the wiki as opposed to the normal test-administrators who can only use it in one test. Cbrown1023 talk 17:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support This vote doens't count. -Markvondeegel 17:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC) (  Contributor to the Test-Administrator's Test)[reply]
  Support SF-Language 10:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

umm... there is no discussion... Mark is already an admin. :) His support was jokingly. Vote closed; he is already an admin. Cbrown1023 talk 01:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ooswesthoesbes for Limburgish Wikiquote

Currently there are 46 pages but after 5 days there will be more than 50 pages. There's a test-administrator needed to keep control on the test WikiQuote. Untill now I have been the only active user at the project. But I expect that the original proposer (User:Hojeraop) comes to edit too. I have no (test-)administrators expirience untill now. --Ooswesthoesbes 09:34, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

¡LIMBURGERS!: Bekiek ouch estebleef ef dit oppe Wiktionair!!

¡NEDERLANDERS!: Bekijk ook even dit op de Wiktionary!!

¡OTHER PEOPLE!: Also take a look at this on the Wiktionary!!

  Done SPQRobin 13:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Tonyfroio for Multilingual Wiktionary

That project is growing up quickly. There are Template:Wikt/mul/NUMBEROFPAGES pages now and I think that a test admin is needed there. --Tonyfroio 13:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Support many, many edits. over 50 articles. He will be a good test-administrator. -Markvondeegel 13:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support hm, SPQRobin, the proposer is incubator admin yet, but it can't harm to have another admin thereinterested users (on meta request page) SPQRobin (Admin) Ooswesthoesbes (Maybe Admin soon), Markvondeegel (Admin), MF-Warburg (Admin), Tonyfroio (Maybe Admin soon) MF-Warburg 16:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment @MF-Warburg: If you read the policy you'll see that it says I only can use my administrators-rights on my own test(Wq/li) --Ooswesthoesbes 16:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
yes, but in emergencies.... MF-Warburg 16:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Than it needs to be a real big emergency (where do you need 5 administrators for?) --Ooswesthoesbes 17:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking the exact same thing, MF-Warburg. :) (about SPQRobin). Cbrown1023 talk 17:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support --Ooswesthoesbes 16:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 17:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak   Support SQPRobin is really enough, but I se no problem with you being there as well. Cbrown1023 talk 17:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support SF-Language 10:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support I like this idea. JHaeneberghen 15:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Angela 18:16, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Filipinayzd at Wp/bcl

I'm an active contributor to the test and I think there's a sysop needed. --Filipinayzd 13:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Support an active member, more than one person edits the test. -Markvondeegel 13:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support per Markvondeegel, I have no problems with you having test-adminship. Cbrown1023 talk 14:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support --MF-Warburg 15:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Neutral I have nothing against him, but he looks a bit unfamiliar with these permissions, a little bit "newbie". Not bad meant. SPQRobin 19:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support JHaeneberghen 15:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Angela 18:16, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steven*fung at Wp/bcl

I would like to request a test adminship. I am currently developing the Bikol Wiki together with user Filipinayzd. At present, there are nearly 200 articles in this wiki after just one month in the Incubator. We are both working hard to translate the interface messages and are nearly halfway to completion. An adminship would be helpful in making the project more efficient. Thank you for your support. --Steven*fung 22:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steven*fung has made substantial contributions to the development of the Bikol Incubator project. --Jose77 03:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would support this, but Filipinazyd is test admin for Bikol test-wiki yet and actually one test sysop is enough (isn't it even policy that there should be only test sysop?). MF-Warburg 11:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking this, but didn't want to get into it unless another suggested it too. :-) The relevant quip is "You can be a test admin for more than one test; however, it is unlikely that there will be more than one admin allowed for each test." It seems to be more of a guideline than a policy, can Steven*fung explain why he feels another sysop is necessary? Cbrown1023 talk 00:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Two heads are better than one :) We won't spoil the broth. --Filipinayzd 11:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I wasn't actually aware of this. However, if it isn't set in stone and is more of a guideline than a "law", it would be good to have two admins as we are both working from 8 time zones away (I'm in London and Filipinayzd is in the Philippines) and the new wiki would greatly benefit from the 24/7 monitoring that our adminship would provide. We are both fully committed to this test project and a twin adminship would consolidate our efforts in making this a truly successful wiki (currently, already 200 articles and expanding...)So if no one has any overwhelming objections, there's no reason why this shouldn't work. But whatever you decide, I will continue to support Filipinazyd 100%. I'm sorry if I caused any confusion. --Steven*fung 01:02, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that is not policy, but could any other test contributors point out their opinion? MF-Warburg 05:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done, I made Steven*fung now test admin because there were no opposes. (I did that yesterday yet, but afterwards my computer crashed :-(. I also know that it was too early, but 3 hours sooner or later...) --MF-Warburg 09:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Testadmin for Saterfrisian

Indeed Wp/stq has increased quite a bit over the last year, but I think I am able to be a test administrator for it for the next year too. So I here apply for it. --Pyt 17:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Support He's expirienced. Wikjba'cakp' 17:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support SPQRobin 17:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support He has made significant contributions. --Jose77 21:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support SF-Language 11:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support -Markvondeegel 12:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support --MF-W admin, bureaucrat 17:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support He has demonstrated that he's a good administrator. Adeiqha 17:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support --Ooswesthoesbes 14:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done Cbrown1023 talk 00:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikjba'cakp' at Machei' Ese Test Wikipedia and Machei' Ese Test Wiktionary

I would like to have testadminship for wp/mcq and wt/mcq because I think we can use it there. The test now has 50 pages and more than 1 contributor: User:Wikjba'cakp', User:SF-Language, User:Adeiqha and User:El Moccidaq. Wikjba'cakp' 09:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Support Active, creator SF-Language 11:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)   Contributor to the Test-Administrator's Test[reply]
  Support --MF-W admin, bureaucrat 11:25, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support Native speaker of one of the two languages. -Markvondeegel 12:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
which two languages? MF-W admin, bureaucrat 12:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please take a look at the mainpage (wp/mcq) it's splitted in two. There are two languages who share mcq. -Markvondeegel 12:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
ah. --MF-W admin, bureaucrat 17:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  Support Adeiqha 17:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC) (  Contributor to the Test-Administrator's Test)[reply]
  Support --Ooswesthoesbes 14:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done now testadmin. -Markvondeegel 15:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better, Extremaduran

Hi! At the moment, i colaborate in the Extremaduran test proyect and traslate the interface. MF-Warburg told me about being a test administrator... and here i am. Greetings! Tiu Chelu 15:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done --MF-W {a, b} Visit IRC! 09:51, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eko (wp/rif)

Good Evening, Timensiwin (in my language). I request adminship for the wikimedia incubator in my language Tarrifit.

  Done as there were no opposes. --MF-W {a, b} Visit IRC! 17:27, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mohau (wp/nso)

Here is my request to be a test administrator on Sepedi Test Project. Thanks in advance. Mohau 13:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done --MF-W {a, b} Visit IRC! 13:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ayour (wp/shi)

hi everybody, i request to be a test administrator on tachelhit's test project. thank you very much.

Unfortunately there are no 50 articles yet and there's only 1 contributor to this test: [6]. Please create more articles and find another interested user before you can become a test-admin. -Markvondeegel 18:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done please create 50 articles and request again. -Markvondeegel 11:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consta (contributions), at Wp/pnt

I wish to apply for admnistrator status for Pontic pages. -Consta 13:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Not done - sorry, but the pontic test has not yet 50 pages. --MF-W {a, b} Visit IRC! 14:45, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pe7er (contributions), Wp/dsb

I wish to apply for test admnistrator status for Lower Sorbian pages. Pe7er 15:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done --MF-W {a, b} Visit IRC! 21:25, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Filipinayzd, Wt/bcl and Wt/fil

I wish to apply for test admnistrator for Bikol and Filipino Wiktionary. I was a test administrator of the recently created Bikol Wikipedia --Filipinayzd 17:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. --Filipinayzd 19:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to apply for test admnistrator for Bikol Wikipedia. --Filipinayzd 15:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ehm... Already created, maybe? --Ooswesthoesbes 16:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see the protect and delete buttons.. --Filipinayzd 17:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ow, I misunderstood. I can't see those buttons on the Limburgish Wikiquote either. Somewhere on meta a request has been made, so you will get temporary adminship on Bikol Wikipedia, I don't know when you get it and when they'll take it away. It's good to make a new request for your adminship on Bikol Wikipedia. --Ooswesthoesbes 18:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked at Meta, but they haven't done it yet... I will wake up the stewards to look at the request :-) SPQRobin 18:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't wake them up :-) SPQRobin 14:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I will make a request when the test becomes active. --Filipinayzd 19:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ooswesthoesbes at Wt/loz, wp/loz, wb/li, wn/li, wt/zea

Since this is more fair. I'm already test-admin, but want to stay so. I'm contributor to all five projects above and speak all languages. Wt/loz has 100 pages. --Ooswesthoesbes 16:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion has been 5 days now. Since Ooswesthoesbes is test admin yet,   Done. --MF-W {a, b} Visit IRC! 15:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Girmitya for Wp/hif and Wt/hif

I wish to apply for test admnistrator for Fiji Hindi Wikipedia and Fiji Hindi Wiktionary. Fiji Hindi Wikipedia has 76 pages Fiji Hindi Wiktionary has 101 pages. Girmitya 05:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  Done SPQRobin 11:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://incubator.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incubator:Administrators/Archive/Test_adminship_2007&oldid=513214"