Wp/akz/Wikipàaθia:Naaɬiilka iisapaatalka

< Wp | akz
Latest comment: 20 days ago by Notluckylinguist in topic Questioning Several pages on this site

Wp > akz > Wikipàaθia:Naaɬiilka iisapaatalka


On ti chuka! Ya ooli naaɬiilka iisapaatalka, naaɬiilkaahofanti paachaahakáhmi.

Bábalokispaahachàali.

Users

edit

If you are interested in editing¹ this new wiki, please add your name below! :) --Ooswesthoesbes 05:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

  1. Ooswesthoesbes 05:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
  2. Markvondeegel 18:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
  3. Breckenheimer 15:03, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
  4. ...
  5. ...

¹ editing in any form, from using a bot, fixing templates and adding interwikis to writting new articles and correcting text.

Iñfakopli

edit

SPQRobin ooli naaþiika, máyachi hastalli iñfakopli awáh. Híichachi? --Ooswesthoesbes 15:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ánko akki ooli choba. Im áþe ooli, akki aþþa. -Markvondeegel 10:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


More relevant articles would help

edit

This wiki needs content that is relevant to native speakers. Right now it contains many bot-type pages about towns in Germany, Maine, Massachussets, Rhode Island, and Vermont. I'd suggest taking a practical, illustrated dictionary approach to balance out the content at this point, and add the automated bot-type articles after we cover some more of the basic topics and vocabulary. Djembayz (talk) 17:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Reply


Alabama online dictionary available

edit

A very nice online dictionary of Alabama is now available:

I hope we can add some content from this dictionary, so as to make these pages more useful for people who speak the language. Djembayz (talk) 17:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Questioning Several pages on this site

edit

Hi there: I'm a linguist currently working on Alabama and there are several pages in this site that don't seem to be any kind of Alabama. Firstly, there are letters which are not used in any script. Chàʷmaninnaaɬiilka, used in [1] has a ʷ. Like wise Uʷpà has u, which does not occur. There are some articles where most of the words are correct (at least, pulled from the dictionary), but very few are grammatically accurate. There are also some suspicious loanwords that seem crafted by a non-native speaker. Like aadípàrtmànti (from the same article earlier). This seems to try to be a loan of department? Most speakers I've worked with would loan it something like dipartmantka. Even the name wikipedia has a theta which does not appear anywhere in the language; there's not even a phoneme for it.

Looking through, the grammar is just completely wrong. ooli is used as a copula, when its actually an auxiliary used in cleft constructions. the locative suffix -fa and the positional prefix aa- (which is restricted to verbs of position) are used haphazardly to mean "in" in different pages, which is not at all their distribution with native speakers. I suspect these pages were not made by someone with a command of the language, but just by directly translating using a dictionary. In any case, many of these pages need to be reevaluated. I highly doubt there is many, if any pages which have a single grammatical sentence. Notluckylinguist (talk) 02:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply